Newsroom Magazine USA Edition USA Edition Today Is Saturday, May 25, 2013

Contact Information

Newsroom Banner




There is a higher calling — one that rests in an honored realm beyond the ordinary affairs of men.

It is a sacred place — having been erected in the traditions of freedom, and consecrated in the blood of those who have paid the ultimate price in pursuing journalism’s enduring quest for truth.

The Honorable House Of The Fourth Estate being that place in the American experience where the bells of freedom ring loud and clear so that all free men and women shall forever know what matters most to their livelihoods, families, communities and nation.

Credible - Responsible - Probative

Credibility is the foundation for all journalism no matter medium or method of transmission.

Relevancy to our livelihoods, families, communities and nation are central to how we define news.

New media journalism is a servant of the people.

Being relevant demands that new media journalism stand-in for our viewers, readers, listeners or visitors and defend the public’s right to know what persons, institutions and governments are doing in the name of free and sovereign citizens.

Experienced and credible new media news services are tenured, qualified and full fledged members of the free press, second to none and equal to all.

Probity, accuracy, balance, provenance, and credibility in journalism are the currency of the realm in earning and maintaining public trust and confidence.

Robert Butche Publisher



Editorial Standards & Policies
   Browsing Materials Tagged Airbus A320 Organized In Date Order [ 2 items ]   
First Item Earlier Middle Item Last Item
Published: Thursday July 12, 2012 8:00 am EDT
Updated: Thursday July 12, 2012 9:50 am EDT
Transportation Department Section
Article Length: 425 Words
Reading Time: 2 Minutes

In the first case, the FAA alleges Delta failed to repair a chip in the nose radome, or nose cone, on the B-737 after an FAA inspector conducted a pre-flight inspection and informed Delta he had observed chip damage. Delta’s structural repair manual requires the airline to seal radome chip damage before further flight. The enroute inspection took place Feb. 25, 2010, and the airline operated the plane on 20 additional flights between that date and March 1 while the aircraft was not in compliance.

Washington

Federal Aviation Administration

Press Release – FAA Proposes $987,500 In Civil Penalties Against Delta Air Lines

July 11, 2012

ATLANTA – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing two civil penalties totaling $987,500 against Delta Air Lines of Atlanta, for allegedly operating an Airbus A320 and a Boeing 737-800 on flights when they were not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

In the first case, the FAA alleges Delta failed to repair a chip in the nose radome, or nose cone, on the B-737 after an FAA inspector conducted a pre-flight inspection and informed Delta he had observed chip damage. Delta’s structural repair manual requires the airline to seal radome chip damage before further flight. The enroute inspection took place Feb. 25, 2010, and the airline operated the plane on 20 additional flights between that date and March 1 while the aircraft was not in compliance.

The FAA further alleges Delta again failed to repair the radome during layover inspections of the aircraft on Feb. 25 and 28. The proposed civil penalty is $687,500.

“Safety is our highest priority,” said FAA Acting Administrator Michael Huerta.  “Operators must follow the proper procedures to maintain their aircraft.”

The FAA also proposes a civil penalty of $300,000 against Delta for allegedly operating an Airbus A320 on 884 flights between May 25, 2010 and Jan. 3, 2011, when it was not in compliance with FAA regulations.

The FAA alleges the carrier incorrectly deferred repair of a broken cockpit floodlight socket at the first officer’s position. Maintenance procedures allow the airline to defer repairs on a dome light for no more than 10 days before repairing or replacing it.  The FAA discovered the alleged violation during a routine inspection.

Delta has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letters to respond to the agency.

Source: Federal Aviation Administration – Transportation Department

Search Optimization Tags: * * * *